About

The council’s record

Every roll call the Chico City Council took since November 2008: 3,116 votes from 454 sets of minutes, with the full text of the minutes to search. What was moved, the outcome, and who voted how, as the clerk wrote it, each linked to the City’s own minutes. History, not a scorecard.

The record runs from Nov 18, 2008 to Sep 1, 2026. Nothing newer is read: the City’s meeting portal (chico-ca.granicus.com) asks crawlers not to visit, and we respect that. For later meetings, see the City’s own archive.

Apr 17, 2018·Carried 7–0·contracts·item 4.6.

A motion was made by Councilmember Ory and seconded by Councilmember Stone to authorize the City Manager to execute a Five-Year Ground and Property Lease By and Between The City of Chico and the Chico History Museum, Inc.

Aye Coolidge, Ory, Schwab, Sorensen, Stone, Fillmer, Morgan

The minutes

Where the words appear in the minutes’ full text: discussion, public comment and reports as well as motions.

  • Apr 4, 2023·4/4/23 City Council

    ADJOURNED REGULAR CHICO CITY COUNCIL MEETING - April 4, 2023 Minutes 1.1. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 1.2. Call to Order - Mayor Coolidge called the April 4, 2023 City Council meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 1.3. Invocation - Pastor Cherise Gardner, Chico Adventist Church 1.4. Pledge…

    Read the minutes

  • Apr 17, 2018·4/17/18 City Council Meeting

    ADJOURNED REGULAR CHICO CITY COUNCIL MEETING — April 17, 2018 Minutes 1.1. ADJOURNED REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - 6:00 p.m. 1.2. Call to Order - Mayor Morgan called the April 17, 2018 - Adjourned Regular City Council meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, 421 Main S…

    Read the minutes

Read from the City’s minutes, every era of them (scanned ones by OCR), by matching each motion with the “AYES / NOES / ABSENT” lines below it and each name against that meeting’s roll call. A name the parser couldn’t match is left out, not guessed. The consent calendar (one vote adopting many routine items) is its own topic. Read the motion before drawing a conclusion: a “no” can be a vote against an amendment, not the policy.