About
The council’s record
Every roll call the Chico City Council took since November 2008: 3,116 votes from 454 sets of minutes, with the full text of the minutes to search. What was moved, the outcome, and who voted how, as the clerk wrote it, each linked to the City’s own minutes. History, not a scorecard.
The record runs from Nov 18, 2008 to Sep 1, 2026. Nothing newer is read: the City’s meeting portal (chico-ca.granicus.com) asks crawlers not to visit, and we respect that. For later meetings, see the City’s own archive.
1 roll call for “second cousin”
Jan 6, 2026·Carried 6–0·transportation·item 4.2.
A motion was made by Councilmember Goldstein and seconded by Councilmember Hawley to adopt the following the first resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 05-26 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHICO APPROVING AN APPEAL AND REMOVING CONDI… The whole motion
A motion was made by Councilmember Goldstein and seconded by Councilmember Hawley to adopt the following the first resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 05-26 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHICO APPROVING AN APPEAL AND REMOVING CONDITION #9 OF APPROVAL OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 25-07 (SECOND COUSIN) (119 MAIN STREET)
Aye Goldstein, Hawley, O'Brien, Winslow, Bennett, Reynolds
Abstained or recused van Overbeek
The minutes
In the minutes
Where the words appear in the minutes’ full text: discussion, public comment and reports as well as motions.
Jan 6, 2026·1/6/26 Council Meeting
…v. Chico - Council was briefed; no formal action was taken. 2. CONSENT AGENDA - /tem 2.4 was removed from the agenda for further discussion by Council. A motion was made by Councilmember O'Brien and seconded by Councilmember van Overbeek to approve the Consent Agenda as read, with Item 2.4 being removed for further discussion. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Goldstein, Hawley, O'Brien, van Overbeek, Winslow, Bennett, Reynolds NOES: None 2.1. ORD…
Read the minutes
How this is made
Read from the City’s minutes, every era of them (scanned ones by OCR), by matching each motion with the “AYES / NOES / ABSENT” lines below it and each name against that meeting’s roll call. A name the parser couldn’t match is left out, not guessed. The consent calendar (one vote adopting many routine items) is its own topic. Read the motion before drawing a conclusion: a “no” can be a vote against an amendment, not the policy.