About
The council’s record
Every roll call the Chico City Council took since November 2008: 3,116 votes from 454 sets of minutes, with the full text of the minutes to search. What was moved, the outcome, and who voted how, as the clerk wrote it, each linked to the City’s own minutes. History, not a scorecard.
The record runs from Nov 18, 2008 to Sep 1, 2026. Nothing newer is read: the City’s meeting portal (chico-ca.granicus.com) asks crawlers not to visit, and we respect that. For later meetings, see the City’s own archive.
1 roll call for “stoble coffee”
Aug 1, 2023·Carried 5–0·transportation·item 5.2.
A motion was made by Councilmember van Overbeek and seconded by Councilmember Winslow to adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 54-23 — RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHICO AUTHORIZING GRANT OF LICENSE TO THIEOREM COL… The whole motion
A motion was made by Councilmember van Overbeek and seconded by Councilmember Winslow to adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 54-23 — RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHICO AUTHORIZING GRANT OF LICENSE TO THIEOREM COLLECTIVE, LLC (STOBLE COFFEE) FOR THE ENCROACHMENT ON PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AT 418 BROADWAY STREET
Aye Bennett, Tandon, van Overbeek, Winslow, Coolidge
Absent Morgan, Reynolds
The minutes
In the minutes
Where the words appear in the minutes’ full text: discussion, public comment and reports as well as motions.
Aug 1, 2023·8/1/23 City Council
…motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Bennett, Tandon, van Overbeek, Winslow, Coolidge NOES: None ABSENT: Morgan, Reynolds 5.2. CONSIDERATION OF A GRANT OF LICENSE TO THIEOREM COLLECTIVE, LLC (STOBLE COFFEE) FOR THE ENCROACHMENT ON PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AT 418 BROADWAY STREET The Public Works Director-Engineering recommended the adoption of the resolution, which would authorize the Grant of License and execution of the Grant of License by the City Manager (…
Read the minutes
How this is made
Read from the City’s minutes, every era of them (scanned ones by OCR), by matching each motion with the “AYES / NOES / ABSENT” lines below it and each name against that meeting’s roll call. A name the parser couldn’t match is left out, not guessed. The consent calendar (one vote adopting many routine items) is its own topic. Read the motion before drawing a conclusion: a “no” can be a vote against an amendment, not the policy.